That’s right. Come some point early next week, when the November NineTM has played down to one, we think that’s the headline we’ll be posting (again). Jeff Shulman is our pick to win it.
(Editor’s Note I: reference this excellent thread in 2+2 for a detailed breakdown of starting final table chip counts and results from 2004 to present)
(Editor’s Note II: If Shulman DOES win, Jeff Madsen will probably put out a theory that the final table was actually filmed yesterday in a secret bunker deep inside the Rio where they also filmed the moon landing and that’s how we knew the results. Also, if you still believe in the 9/11 conspiracy, read this).
Why Shulman?
A few bunch of factors: He’s got a healthy stack, with 19.58M chip (10% of chips in play). He’s experienced. This is his second WSOP final table of the decade. He’s been on TV (mostly via Poker SuperStars) many times. And he’s freaking editor of Card Player magazine. Dude has been in the industry long enough to not let all of this get to his head. So the spotlight isn’t going to affect/distract him as much as it does others (see: Phillips, Dennis). Plus, we’re big believers in the unscientific theory of, “Hey, if it’s your year, it’s your year.” And it’s the Shulmans’ year.
Why is it Shulmans’ year? Of course, Barry Shulman, Jeff’s dad, won the WSOPE Main Event. But it goes deeper than that. It’s about redemption.
After years of being out of favor with “the industry”TM due to its strong-arming tactics, Card Player, who has at least been a little kinder and gentler under Jeff’s reign, is more than due to have the sun shine on its ass. CP has been kicked to the curb by the WSOP and the WPT. Even in the WSOP Media Guide, the very last line of Shulman’s bio contains the mini-shot, “A vocal WSOP critic, despite his ongoing participation and success.” Nobody else has anything remotely close to a personally shot in their bio. So yes, this is redemption time, at least for the Shulmans. Jeff has shown a very disciplined game in ESPN broadcasts, he’s being “coached” by the best NLH tournament closer of all-time, Phil Hellmuth, and despite his comment about throwing the bracelet in the garbage, he’s repped himself well on TV (i.e. not a douche, like some others).
So yeah, after years of it not being the Shulmans’ year, it’s their year again. He’s our pick.
But if it’s not Jeff Shulman, then who will it be?
After 197 episodes, the 2009 WSOP Main Event finally plays down to the final table–or as we call it, The November NineTM–on ESPN tonight.
Unlike 2007 (effing brutal) and 2008 (almost as effing brutal), there was a lot of “electricity” among us in the so-called “media” as the field got smaller and smaller in the WSOP Main Event.
Phil Ivey possibly making the final table obviously played a huge part in creating that buzz, but there really are some intriguing story lines that we’ll see in tonight’s episode of the WSOP on ESPN as they play down to the November NineTM. Will Jeff Shulman, who is making his second WSOP final table of the decade, really throw the bracelet into the garbage if he wins? Can Darvin Moon, a ginger logger who doesn’t even have an email address, literally come out of nowhere and bank over $8M? Can Joe Cada become the second youngest Main Event winner in a row? Can Antoine Saout prove that France can actually win something…anything?
Below are some of our favorite posts from that day. Look for Dr. Pauly’s always stellar recap sometime later today/tomorrow (right Pauly?) here. And finally in semi-related news, watch the new Inside Dealhere.
CardPlayer CEO Barry Shulman (above) beat Daniel Negreanu heads-up to win the 2009 World Series of Poker Europe early this morning.
While Annette Obrestad’s WSOP Europe win in 2007 had us hiding in our underground bunker as we awaited the Apocalypse, CardPlayer CEO Barry Shulman’s victory early this morning in London has us kicking our dogs, cutting off people on the freeway and just being all around total douchebags. Because apparently good things happen to people who suck.
In what was an epic heads-up battle between good and evil that lasted more than five hours, the “good guy” Daniel Negreanu came up short of the title after the so-called “Hand of the Year,” or as we like to call it, “Any given hand on any given night on Full Tilt.” Getting all-in on a flop of 5d-8d-Jc with Qc-Jd against Shulman’s pocket aces, Negreanu took the lead with trips after a jack fell on the river. As the crowd erupted, we thought about how much we fuckin hate writing hand recaps …blah blah blah and Shulman hit an ace on the river to give him a commanding chip lead over Negreanu. One hand later, Shulman was dealt tens to Negreanu’s pocket fours and sealed the title by hitting a set. Shulman banks £801,603, or approximately $156 million US dollars, for the win.
You can watch the above play out in this video. The crowd’s response is pretty telling. If you’re wondering who the only person is cheering for Shulman, it’s his wife.
To Shulman’s credit, he didn’t disparage Harrah’s or the bracelet he won (yet), something his son Jeff Shulman promises to do if he wins the WSOP Main Event this November.
This was Negreanu’s second consecutive WSOPE final table appearance, and with his £495,589 cash today, he is now the all-time leading money winner for career lifetime earnings. And that probably means absolutely jack squat to him right about now.
For a complete account of the final table action, go here.
You'd think a bunch of dudes who just became millionaires could at least crack a freaking smile.
The 2009 WSOP Main Eventhas played down to the November NineTM, which means it’s time for our second annual (sort of) Good for PokerTM, Bad for PokerTM, Meh for PokerTM list.
First things first, had Phil Ivey not N9′d it, this would be a turd of a final table on par with 2007. Probably even worse. Just like Cush would’ve saved all for Jerry, Ivey saved all for this final table from a marketing and general mass public interest perspective.
Anyway, we polled a number of people in the so-called “media,” industry types, and pros to gather opinions to go along with our own. Below is the general consensus. Note that just because someone might be listed as Bad for Poker, that doesn’t mean he is a bad dude (except maybe for Shulman). It just means they won’t do much to promote the sport and help the game grow, among other things.
For a more detailed “analysis” of this list, check out our column in next month’s edition of Bluff Magazine.
Meh for Poker
Steve Begleiter: Are you excited about an ex-Bear Sterns executive in his 50’s winning the WSOP Main Event? Didn’t think so.
Kevin Schaffel: Another average-looking 50-something white guy. Schaffler lives in Florida and has no real desire to play poker full-time. He’s this year’s Dan Nassif.
James Akenhead: This one was the toughest for us to peg. Akenhead is a good young player from the U.K. He looks exactly like you’d think a good young player fro the U.K. would look like (this isn’t really meant as a knock, but the guy looks British). Everyone we spoke with in the industry, including the players, didn’t really have an opinion on the guy. Could be good, probably won’t be bad, so let’s go with Meh for now.
Bad for Poker
Antoine Saout: Eff France.
Eric Buchman: The guy is a straight-up mercenary who says he’s only in it for the money. Whoever wins the WSOP Main Event is the focal point of poker for a year. If Buchman wants no part of that, that’s his right, but it doesn’t mean he’s good for the game.
Darvin Moon: Of every N9’er we asked our peers in the industry about, Darvin Moon caused the most amount of debate. Some argued he could be another Moneymaker. The problem with that is we’re not sure if Moon even knows what the Internet is. Others we’ve spoken with say Moon could be the worst thing that ever happened to poker. He’s another one that really doesn’t care about the “celebrity” attached with winning poker’s biggest tournament and he basically luckboxed his way this far. We say Moon, a ginger, is a ginger. So for now, we’re keeping the final table chip leader in the Bad for Poker column. Given his huge chip lead and chances of winning the final table, we hope he’ll change our minds.
Jeff Shulman: Just reread this. Great storyline and we’re kind of glad he made it to the final table and is stirring the pot, but would be about as bad as it gets for a winner.
Good For Poker
Joe Cada: The 21 year-old online whiz has a good attitude, could become the youngest ME winner ever, and doesn’t seem averse to doing the media tour. Works for us.
Phil Ivey: Across the board, the only person on this list that everyone agrees is unequivocally Good for Poker. Great mainstream story here that the press will push about Ivey being the Tiger Woods of Poker. Big boost for the game if the best player wins its most prestigious (and televised) tournament. If Ivey wins and does the talk show circuit that Peter Eastgate turned down last year, maybe we see another Moneymaker-esque effect.
"Wicked Chops Poker are nobodies, the site is garbage." - Anna Benson
"A sophisticated and creative blog that pokes rambunctious, irreverent and most of all sexy fun at the game of poker and everyone who is connected with it." - PokerMagazine.com
"You've made me so angry I wish I could reach into my screen and just pound your scummy worthless head in!!" - a Nickelback fan
"If you ask me, you should just go straight to Wicked Chops Poker instead. These guys are awesome." - Kajagugu Poker
"...el blog más irreverente de la blogocosa norteamericana..." - Poquer Red
"Wicked Chops is wickedly funny. And wickedly irreverent. And posts a lot of photos of wickedly attractive women. If that ain't poker, what is?" - TypePad